Method 1:
Works only if you are the superior, start with a dominating accusatory tone, put the person at defence. Words your statement ambiguously, let the person defends himself, repeat your wording accusatory and see how the person flows the information out.
Method 2:
To be used on peers. Start with open statements, wait for explanation, repeat same open statements, wait for expanded explanation, choose a particular clarification from the explanation, wait for explanation, repeat back same beginning open statement.
What can I says about the facts of life about works from the above?
Friday, May 29, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment